|
FEUDAL
ABOLITION
Constitution of real burdens
over properties in developments
Since the Appointed Day, the Pre-Registration Enquiries
Section has received many enquiries from agents concerning the Keeper's
practices and procedures in connection with the imposition of new
burdens. A particular area of interest has been the imposition of
real burdens on property developments.
The purpose of the following is to provide some background information
on the registration of constitutive deeds post appointed day. There
are also related frequently asked questions which will hopefully
be of further assistance.
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS AND REAL BURDENS
In a situation where a developer or a landowner is selling a number
of related units of property, such as flats in a tenement, houses
on an estate or adjoining plots of land and wishes to impose new
real burdens on them, the future proprietors of those units might
wish to be able to enforce any new real burdens imposed on those
units on a reciprocal basis. Burdens created in this way are known
as "community burdens". The title sheet for each unit
in the development will show that it is both burdened by real burdens
and also has the right to enforce those same real burdens against
other units in the development.
However, the landowner/developer may also wish to have enforcement
rights against each proprietor. As the developer's/landowner's property
is not generally burdened with burdens that are identical to those
imposed on the individual units sold, these are sometimes known
as "neighbour burdens". In this case, only the landowner/developer's
title sheet will specify that it is the benefited property.
The Keeper has no view as to which method of creating real burdens
should be used in respect of such a situation. The decision as to
who should have enforcement rights and how this can best be achieved
is always a matter for those advising parties.
However, the Title Conditions Act sets out rules that must be complied
with in order to create real burdens. How this is done will depend
on whether you wish to create "neighbour burdens" in respect
of separate burdened and benefited properties or "community
burdens" which are mutually enforceable by each unit in a larger
scheme or community of properties. The requirements for forms and
fees will depend upon the option you select.
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS - TYPES OF DEED USED TO IMPOSE REAL
BURDENS
While it is not the Keeper's role to prescribe the method by which
real burdens are created, it is noted that there are differing implications
for the registration of a constitutive deed, depending on which
method you elect to use.
The focus of the following information is the creation of community
burdens.
Deeds of Conditions
Many parties will wish to use a deed of conditions with the intention
that once all of the properties are sold, the burdens will remain
mutually enforceable among the proprietors of the various units
within the development. These are "community burdens"
- in respect of which each property is a burdened and benefited
property - and the rules governing their creation are set out in
the Title Conditions Act.
The use of a deed of conditions in anticipation of subsequent sales
will generally only require a single application for registration
against the developer's title for which only one fee is required.
Single Disposition
Another option seems to be the use of the first disposition out
of a development selling only one unit but imposing community burdens
on the whole development - this is a bit like incorporating a deed
of conditions into the disposition. This would require two applications
(a) one in respect of the unit sold and (b) a further application
against the Parent Title in the Land Register or where appropriate,
the remnant of the development in the General Register of Sasines.
(This would also allow for the creation of unique "neighbour
burdens" if required.)
Consecutive Dispositions
Thirdly, it is possible to create real burdens using dispositions
of individual units, whereby in terms of each disposition only the
unit being disponed is burdened by the real burdens set out in it.
However, it is the Keeper's opinion that if the parties intend to
create 'community burdens' by using dispositions in this way each
disposition should also
• nominate all the individual units in the development as
benefited properties (not merely by using the parent title number
or a description of the remnant of the development where it is unregistered
but also by describing each unit which has already been sold)
• be dual registered against those properties (i.e. the parent/developer's
title and any properties already sold off); and
• expressly state that the property being sold will also have
the benefit of the burdens created in the dispositions of units
sold earlier as is required by section 12 of the Title Conditions
Act.
Whilst a deed which burdens only the unit in the process of being
sold, and only nominates the remnant of the developer's title (often
a registered title in the Land Register) as the benefited property
can be registered, as it meets the requirements of section 4 of
the Title Conditions Act, this will not create community burdens.
The Keeper's opinion is that the net effect of using dispositions
drafted in this manner is, in terms of the Title Conditions Act,
that when each disposition is registered, the benefited property
(the residue of the parent title) in respect of the burdens is diminishing
in size. If this pattern continues it is possible that only the
last unit or the land retained by the developer (if any) will have
any enforcement rights. As a consequence, the title sheet for the
last unit of property (or residue) will be the only one to show
that it has enforcement rights.
|