share in the property. If one dies before
the other without evacuating the special destination by intervivos or, where
competent, mortis causa deed then that persons
half pro indiviso share falls to theother automatically. In that event the
Keeper will not issue a fully indemnified title to the survivor, ora person deriving title
from the survivor, unless he is satisfied
that the destination has not beenevacuated. In these circumstances
the Keeper will require to examine the
death certificate, andevidence
that the destination was not evacuated. Documentary evidence of this latter nature
is noteasy to
produce. For instance, even if a testamentary writing which does not evacuate
the destinationis
produced, that in itself is not conclusive evidence that there is no other writing,
testamentary or intervivos,
which does evacuate the destination. It is
for that reason that the Keeper requires
writtenassurance
that no such document exists. Such assurance can take the form of an affidavit
by the selleror
a letter from the applicants solicitor.Difficulties
can also arise where it is claimed that the special destination has been evacuated
unilaterallyby
of one of the parties subject to the
special destination. It may be, for instance,
that the specialdestination
contained in the deed has
created a contractual arrangement
between the parties.Consequently, it may not be possible
for the destination to be evacuated by unilateral action. Similarly, itmay be unclear whether the terms of
the deed purporting to evacuate the destination are habile to do so9.Situations such as these are not ones
which the Keeper can easily determine. For that reason the Keeperwill take a cautious approach when
faced with a destination which purports to have been evacuated andmay request that parties with an interest
in the destination consent to the evacuation. Alternatively, theKeeper may recommend that matters be
resolved in court by way of an action of declarator.If
a couple holding title under an equally and survivor destination part, it is common
for the separationagreement
or divorce settlement to provide that one party will convey his or her half share
to theother.
If this is done by a disposition by A to B of As half share, the destination
as regards As half shareis
evacuated. However, it will remain operative
in respect of Bs half share. In
the event of Bpredeceasing
A without evacuating the destination, that
half share will revert to A. In thosecircumstances the special destination
in respect of Bs original half pro indiviso share
will be reflectedin
the title sheet. Should B subsequently wish to evacuate the destination affecting
the original halfpro
indiviso share, similar problems to those detailed in the
preceding paragraph may be encountered.The
accepted solution is for both pro
indiviso proprietors to convey their
respective interests, thusevacuating
the special destination.Adverse
entries in the Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications6.18 In terms of
section 6(1)(c) and rule
5(h) the Keeper is bound to enter
in the proprietorshipsection
of any title sheet a subsisting entry
in the Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications
(ROI)adverse
to the registered interest. The Keeper will note subsisting adverse entries in
the title sheet onlywhen
the title sheet is initially created or subsequently updated. If adverse entries
in the PersonalRegister
are not subsisting they will not appear in the title sheet. So, if a five year
search in the PersonalRegister
reveals a notice of letters of inhibition, letters of inhibition and discharge
of that inhibition,they
will not appear on the title sheet as there is no subsisting adverse entry.By section 44(3)(a) of the Conveyancing
(Scotland) Act 192410 an inhibition prescribes
after 5 years.As
a result, on receipt of an application for registration, the Keeper will search
the ROI for the five yearsprior
to the date of registration against the parties to the transaction and any parties
notified to theKeeper
as having an interest in the subjects. Should that search disclose a subsisting
adverse entry